JonBenet case

**imported_juggernaut28** · August 28th, 2006, 04:54 PM

Karr not to be charged in JonBenet case cause DNA does not match the DNA found in JonBenet's underwear.

Well is this man a quack or what? Admitting to a murder that no evidence proves he is guilty. It doesn't take a genious to see this man has some problems, but why admit to this high profile murder charge when you are innocent? Attention or whatever he has to be somewhat crazy.

The_Sage · August 28th, 2006, 04:56 PM

I have thought all along that he didn't do it,,, the man needs attention evidently....

**imported_juggernaut28** · August 28th, 2006, 05:21 PM

Well even though he is not going to be charged with the murder of JonBenet, he has charges of child pornography pending against him. He is a sick man who really needs some help.

The_Sage · August 28th, 2006, 05:37 PM

He needs to be put in a guillotine and lose his head and private parts at the same time...ha

**imported_juggernaut28** · August 28th, 2006, 05:44 PM

I read on yahoo news where Mr.Karr said he understood how Michael Jackson felt about kids. I am glad he understands him cause I don't understand nothing about the minds of men who has fantasies about being with children. It is so unnatural and until they have a changed heart and admit they are sick and need help, God only knows what these men will do until they are caught.

The_Sage · August 28th, 2006, 05:47 PM

You can't stop them until you do what I said in the previous post...

**ibe4warriors** · August 28th, 2006, 05:59 PM

Gah*I think this is a true meaning of crazy.This man is sick.

**imported_VTgal** · August 29th, 2006, 12:56 PM

From the moment I saw him on TV and heard he was obsessed with the case, I said that he didn't do it and that he just wanted to fullfill some sick fantasy of being involved somehow in the murder.

He's definitely a weirdo. Well, that's probably an understatement, obviously.

August 29th, 2006, 04:23 PM

One of the two, either needs a head check or was about to be burned at the stake . Anyone else think that the DNA might have been botched? Lots of things about this don't seem right. Like the date of death on the tombstone being a day off from the day from the police records.